The first thing I would teach about guard retention

There are many ways to pass the guard.

Let us count a few:

* You can go over the legs (over under)
* You can go around the legs (bullfight/torreando, leg pin, leg drag, etc)
* You can go through the legs (knee cut)
* You can go under legs (double under, over under)

The specific purpose of all of them though is to bypass the legs. But even when that is accomplished, the pass isn’t complete because there is another line of defense.

The passer now has to get through the arms (the frames), but it’s a situation that is little different from a charging army of swordsmen blasting past a line of well armored pikemen before hitting the second line of hastily drafted farmers.

The farmers can only do damage if they have good leadership (know what to do), proper formation (know how to support each other) and strong resolve (reinforced by belief). Likewise the power of frames only truly shows itself when they have similar elements.

But the major difference is that the reinforcement comes from base.

Yup.

One arm frames and the other is used for base, but after that the analogy crumbles.

Why?

It’s because frame and base are not enough to slaughter a pass dead in its tracks. There’s one more element that must be added to the combination, and it’s almost effortless if you do the first two right.

What is it?

Movement, pure and simple.

Frame, base then move. That strategy is the first thing that I would teach anyone who asked me about guard retention. And if you understand it, it’ll be easier to make sense of the specific tactics that are used to kill passes.

Of course though, that’s assuming that they get past you first line of defense.

Stopping them there will make everything easier.

And there are many lessons exactly how you can do that in half guard in a certain place.

Discover it here:

[btnsx id=”6774″]

Maintaining mount and finishing the cross choke with greater ease

Subverting expectations like a true master (or troll)

I have no love for the new Star Wars movie, Last Jedi.

No other movie has ever made me such strong negative emotions. From the opening scene onward, there were so many moments that made me shake my head. In fact, when it was all over, I had to wonder if I really saw what I saw.

And more than a month later, I’ve lost count of all the rant videos I’ve watched about it.

(They’ve all been far more enjoyable to me than the movie was.)

One of the best criticisms though focuses on how the movie is filled with payoffs without setups and setups without payoffs. There’s so many, in fact, that it’s hard to argue that they aren’t all intentional efforts to subvert expectations and deconstruct the mythos of the Star Wars universe.

(Spoiler warning) An example:

In the battle on Crait, the stakes have been set. One wall is all that stands between the Resistance and annihilation. Thus, a final strike team has been sent out using a motley assortment of old land speeders. Their mission? They must stop the cannon before it blows a hole straight through that wall and spells their doom.

That’s the first setup.

As the land speeders rush toward the cannon, they start to get picked off one by one. Hope is dwindling, and finally a retreat is called for. But one fighter chooses to ignore the call.

Who?

Finn.

He’s someone who has shown himself to be cowardly, but now finally, he’s going to overcome fear and sacrifice himself in order to save those he cares about. He takes off his headset. You can see sweat pouring down his face. You can see the anxiety in his eyes. His speeder starts to break apart due to the heat of the charging cannon.

The music becomes epic.

The moment is built up.

And the movie does everything it can to set the expectation that Finn is going to ram into that cannon and destroy it, sacrificing his own life.

And it would have been epic because of the setup of not only the moments leading up to it but also the previous cowardly actions of the character.

But no…

Out of nowhere came a payoff without a setup.

Another character rams her speeder into him, in order to save him, and doom them all (if another savior hadn’t arrived and a previously undiscovered second exit hadn’t been discovered).

There was no setup for it.

In fact, when all the other cruisers broke off, Finn is the only one that continues on. He leaves the others in the dust. You can clearly see him approaching by himself. There’s even a shot when he’s almost to the cannon, and his eyes close.

He’s ready.

And that’s when she comes out of nowhere as if she tapped into her mutant power of teleportation.

Here’s the thing though.

Such subversion is awesome on the mat. If you can make your opponent expect the wrong thing and react accordingly, you will have a leg up on the game.

Case in point:

Earlier though, during the Sunday practice that I run, I caught a triangle from the most unexpected position. It’s an attack that I learned recently from James Booth, and the setup would make you conclude that I was either trying to crush you in knee on belly and step around for the armbar.

Why?

It’s because I have the far underhook and I’m pressuring into the position. But what actually happens is something far different, and in that roll, it completely shocked the guy. He’s like whoa, you got to show me how you did that.

Of course, I did.

And in the future, after I’ve had more time to play with it and troubleshoot, it’ll be going up in micro adjustments. What’s on deck for now, though, is a lesson on how to more effectively attack the near arm from the top of side control.

Find more about the course here:

[btnsx id=”7084″]

A closed guard armbar for the ridiculously lazy (no-gi edition)

A closed guard armbar for the ridiculously lazy